Before presenting the theme of neutrality of ‘race’, we will enter deeper into the subject of refinement (for appreciation of complexity). Being at ease with refinement allows for confidence, tact and accuracy when accessing, assessing and implementing data. The post might inform or be of interest to those who already observe their inner focus and obey its demands.
… or the prologue to becoming racially neutral.
Having observed and experienced humans at varying degrees of intensity and intimacy I asked, what is it, this high-quality human which the universe seems to be in favour of, places ‘value’ on and accepts high spiritual and intellectual demands from. *
Welcome to the new chapter and higher demands. Today’s post is dedicated to those who understand the level of their participation in collective growth, as well as those responsible for managing or leading collective clusters at a global level. We will continue to use terminology already introduced in previous posts, and will refer to understandings already presented there. This post can inform predominantly those who are familiar with my understanding, views and level of engagement.
Silver Training Programme for Teams and Leaders is currently undergoing its second draft for the first delivery in 2017. It is my privilege to share with you the release dates and introduce the core structure. Courses are designed to build upon one another.
and/or Contextualising Environmental Conditioning
Last year I wrote about how nations come into interaction with each other and create a third field. Today I’d like to focus on the micro-level of these interactions comprised mainly of subtle mechanisms of our collective psyche. To make explanations as simple as possible I will use an example of interaction of two people only and illustrate what is included in the third field created through that interaction. I will roughly use the model of Hierarchy 2 to put the explanations in context. My own nomenclature and environmental context of what conditions the third field will also be presented. This post might be of some use to those interested in conflict resolution at the root cause rather than the symptomatic, end stage level.
Now and then I would ask myself what is it that keeps me peering at British politics with almost a devotional attitude as if in hope of glimpsing a revelation or elevation. It seems from the cosmological point of view these are the previously realised insights and adherence to my vision, but on a human, mundane level, I understood it is simply my ever appreciative sense of humour.
Today I will share a little about two strands which influence human conscious and subconscious, therefore human manifestations and results, on a global level. I will turn to aspects of Judaic and Christian traditions, described and included in The Old and The New Testament respectively. The point of this is to illustrate the complimentary attributes of each aspect. The comparative representation aiming at showing superiority of one above the other, is necessarily included in religiously influenced thinking but irrelevant for our analysis. Judaic tradition should not concern itself with Christianity and vice versa.
After David Cameron’s strong stance towards European Union this spring it will be inspiring to see if the camaraderie in Brussels take the hint to look at and re-evaluate their inadequate and overly intruding policies.
Last year, inspired by the Scottish Referendum, I wrote about identity and indicated that externals like family, religion and nation claim the rights to our selves. I put these in ‘external’ category as these groups/phenomena can be easily identified in the outside world in form of members of family, or church, the preachers, politicians, national flags and geography.